A Fair and Equitable Proposal for Dunn Road Remapping

Hello everyone,

Here is the latest scoop on the remapping of the Dunn Road properties.  Last night at the City Council Hearing several of us spoke against the proposed remapping.  We offered a plan that we believe is fair and equitable and meets the goals of remapping.  Here is how it works.

Under the UDO there are several new zoning districts available.  The City wants to drop the current zoning districts and assign properties to one of the new districts.  The goal is to assign a new district that most closely matches the current zoning.  And, the district that most closely matches the current zoning of the Dunn Road properties is the OX zoning district.  In fact, the City’s own guidance document suggests that OX is the preferred zoning district for the property on Dunn Road.

However, the Planning Department has recommended the NX zoning district.

OX stand for Office Mixed Use.  As you know, the current zoning allows offices with small retail.  Here is a table showing just how similar OX is to the current zoning district which is called Buffer Commercial (or BC for short) and how they differ from NX (click on tables for larger view):

table1

You can easily see the similarities and differences between the two zoning districts.  OX does allow slightly larger retail than BC.  However, it is not excessively larger.  The big sticking point is the last one.  Standalone retail means a retail store that is in a building all by itself.  Standalone retail is currently allowed in BC but is not allowed in OX.  OX requires that the retail be in an office building (think, coffee shop) or attached to an office building (that is, the two types of buildings share a common wall).

The owners of the Dunn Road properties have stated that they don’t want to lose standalone retail.  Consequently, they are asking for remapping to NX with certain conditions.  Here you can see how different their proposal is compared to BC and OX:

table2

As you can see under NX the owners do get standalone retail.  However, they are also asking for 30,000 square feet of retail in one or possibly multiple buildings.  How that square footage is distributed is at the owners’ discretion.  They are also asking for drive-thrus.

At first blush, it sounds like 30,000 square feet of retail is better than the 57,000 square feet that was requested under the previous rezoning.  However, the previous rezoning asked for a 30,000 square foot grocery store.

It was the grocery store that generated the most traffic with up to several thousand additional vehicles every Saturday and Sunday and weekday.  Remapping for a 30,000 square foot grocery store that was just denied on May 12 is just not acceptable.

Last Monday on June 21, three of us met with the Dunn Road property owners to discuss an alternative.  This NX-Alternative is illustrated here:

table3

The NX-alternative is what we are advocating for.  The NX-alternative is virtually a match for current zoning with a small increase in the size of retail from 3000 to 4000 square feet per floor per building.

The NX-alternative also meets the City’s stated goal of remapping which is to simply assign a new zoning district that matches current zoning as closely as possible.

The owners, however, are using remapping for their own material gain.  They want to gain 30,000 square feet of retail and they want to gain drive-thrus.  We think that this is unfair and violates the City’s policy for remapping.  It also contradicts the City Council’s own decision on May 12.

On May 12 the rezoning request was for 58,000 square feet of retail on 13 acres of land.  That was for 4400 square feet of retail per acre.  That was denied because it was too much retail and violated the Comprehensive Plan, wasn’t in the public interest, was inappropriate for a watershed protection area, and generated way too much traffic.

Today, the owners are requesting 30,000 square feet of retail on 4 acres of land.  That is for 7500 square feet of retail per acre – nearly double what was requested under rezoning.  It generates nearly the same amount of traffic, still violates several Comprehensive Plan policies, is inappropriate for a watershed protection area, and is not in the public interest.

NX-alternative is what we argued for last night at the City Council Remapping Hearing.  It is more than fair and equitable and fully meets the City’s goals for remapping.

Please let City Council know they you support the NX-alternative.  In particular, please ask our District Councilor, John Odom, to honor his own motto – vote your District!

City Council Email:  citycouncilors@raleighnc.gov
John Odom Email: John.Odom@raleighnc.gov

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s